3,704
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 331:
Line 331: − + + + − − {{note box|Do we really need/want to replace upstart? This is an easy fix now to get COS 6 with e-smith/SME packages to to boot, but it differs from upstream COS, which we try really hard not to do. − − Good question, where is the answer? Please post this to the devinfo mailing list so it can be decided on in this case}}
→Replace upstart with SysVinit
==== Replace upstart with SysVinit ====
==== Replace upstart with SysVinit ====
We've almost finished, we just have to replace upstart with the good old SysVinit, because upstart doesn't support the custom runlevel 7 SME uses
We've almost finished, we just have to replace upstart with the good old SysVinit, because upstart doesn't support the custom runlevel 7 SME uses.
(This topic is currently being discussed here: [[bugzilla:7217|Bug 7217 - Usage of SysVinit, upstart or systemd]] )
<syntaxhighlight lang="Bash">
<syntaxhighlight lang="Bash">
rpm -e --nodeps upstart sysvinit-tools
rpm -e --nodeps upstart sysvinit-tools
rpm -Uvh http://sme-mirror.firewall-services.com/releases/8/smeos/x86_64/SME/SysVinit-2.86-17.el5.x86_64.rpm
rpm -Uvh http://sme-mirror.firewall-services.com/releases/8/smeos/x86_64/SME/SysVinit-2.86-17.el5.x86_64.rpm
</syntaxhighlight>
</syntaxhighlight>
==== Move some perl modules ====
==== Move some perl modules ====