Difference between revisions of "User talk:Timn/categories"
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*** SME Server 9.1 pages | *** SME Server 9.1 pages | ||
| − | The idea is to have 'SME Server Development' as umbrella, and have subcategories 'SME Server 9.x' with their own specific pages, NOT backlinking to the umbrella, just to the parent. | + | The idea is to have 'SME Server Development Framework' as an umbrella, and have subcategories 'SME Server 9.x' with their own specific pages, NOT backlinking to the umbrella, just to the parent. |
[me is confused, so many twists with categories] | [me is confused, so many twists with categories] | ||
Thanks for leading this Tim! | Thanks for leading this Tim! | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| − | + | [[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]]) 16:24, 7 February 2013 (MST) Can add my thanks to that, looks good. | |
| + | |||
| + | The more I go through this the better it looks... | ||
Latest revision as of 02:28, 8 February 2013
RequestedDeletion (talk) Thanks, looks good. For the development part I am organizing all bit sand pieces as follows:
- SME Server Development Framework
- Development tools
- All other CVS, RPM etc stuff
- Various pages on specific how-to's
- SME Server 9.0 Development
- SME Server 9.0 pages
- SME Server 9.1 Development
- SME Server 9.1 pages
The idea is to have 'SME Server Development Framework' as an umbrella, and have subcategories 'SME Server 9.x' with their own specific pages, NOT backlinking to the umbrella, just to the parent.
[me is confused, so many twists with categories]
Thanks for leading this Tim!
Trex (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2013 (MST) Can add my thanks to that, looks good.
The more I go through this the better it looks...
