Difference between revisions of "Talk:Translations"

From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
:If we not implement the above mode, then there is no way to prevent somebody change anything.
 
:If we not implement the above mode, then there is no way to prevent somebody change anything.
 
:I think should exist one resposible for each language, and maybe Shad can implement some email alert to each language changes send to the responsible for this language.--[[User:PicsOne|Normando Hall]] 15:56, 13 March 2008 (MDT)
 
:I think should exist one resposible for each language, and maybe Shad can implement some email alert to each language changes send to the responsible for this language.--[[User:PicsOne|Normando Hall]] 15:56, 13 March 2008 (MDT)
 +
::Maybe can implement a cvs or svn access for each language and each lang responsible, then the resposible can track the changes was made at each language.--[[User:PicsOne|Normando Hall]] 20:57, 13 March 2008 (MDT)
 
==bugs==
 
==bugs==
  

Revision as of 04:57, 14 March 2008

TEAM WORK

I am thinking about translation team..

  • Who is responsible to the correctness of translated language
  • Preventing somebody to change the translation without permission


Is it possible?

Thomasch 01:18, 13 March 2008 (MDT)

The only way I know is to set suggest-only mode of pootle. The bad news about this mode is the responsible must aprove (or decline) ALL suggested translations.
If we not implement the above mode, then there is no way to prevent somebody change anything.
I think should exist one resposible for each language, and maybe Shad can implement some email alert to each language changes send to the responsible for this language.--Normando Hall 15:56, 13 March 2008 (MDT)
Maybe can implement a cvs or svn access for each language and each lang responsible, then the resposible can track the changes was made at each language.--Normando Hall 20:57, 13 March 2008 (MDT)

bugs

Bugs related to Pootle based translations are linked here