Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
is a reboot like that really required? I suspect its put in there by ignorence, even *if* a reboot was required, wouldent it be better to use the signal-event incarnation? ~~
 
is a reboot like that really required? I suspect its put in there by ignorence, even *if* a reboot was required, wouldent it be better to use the signal-event incarnation? ~~
    +
 +
indeed, has been updated[[User:Unnilennium|Unnilennium]] ([[User talk:Unnilennium|talk]]) 12:49, 11 December 2013 (MST)
 
== Please test your script alterations before comitting them ==
 
== Please test your script alterations before comitting them ==
    
It seems that the changes in http://wiki.contribs.org/index.php?title=Custom_CA_Certificate&oldid=15309 broke the script, according to http://forums.contribs.org/index.php/topic,47082.msg231833.html#msg231833 <small>—&nbsp;[[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]])&nbsp;</small> 11:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 
It seems that the changes in http://wiki.contribs.org/index.php?title=Custom_CA_Certificate&oldid=15309 broke the script, according to http://forums.contribs.org/index.php/topic,47082.msg231833.html#msg231833 <small>—&nbsp;[[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]])&nbsp;</small> 11:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
 +
fixed[[User:Unnilennium|Unnilennium]] ([[User talk:Unnilennium|talk]]) 12:49, 11 December 2013 (MST)
Super Admin, Wiki & Docs Team, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
3,250

edits

Navigation menu