74
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + + + + + + + + + +
Category talk:Yum Repository (view source)
Revision as of 22:56, 15 January 2010
, 22:56, 15 January 2010no edit summary
:For now I have removed RPMForge as I see no need for it ATM. Please be a little more carefull next time and raise your questions before taking action certainly when risks like this are involved. Thank in advance. <small>— [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]]) </small> 17:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
:For now I have removed RPMForge as I see no need for it ATM. Please be a little more carefull next time and raise your questions before taking action certainly when risks like this are involved. Thank in advance. <small>— [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]]) </small> 17:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
== RPMForge page requested again :-) ==
I agree that RPMforge used without care could cause problems, which is why I set it to be "enabled=0".
I would still like to see it added, with appropriate 'excludes' to make it safe, because being a superset of Dag and Dries (and others) it contains a wealth of useful RPM for customizing our servers.
I also find it slightly odd that it is so dangerous to add when the SME7 documentation [http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:Administration_Manual:Chapter1] states "SME Server 7 uses many packages from CentOS and RPMForge".
So rather than delete RPMforge page I made why not add to or correct what I had started?
Respectfully yours, --[[User:Markleman|Markleman]] 20:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)